RESUMO
Introduction: Complete macroscopic cytoreduction represents the most important prognostic parameter for overall survival in ovarian cancer. This dogma remains tenacious despite significant improvements in adjuvant systemic treatment. Hence, optimization of surgical therapy is an overarching goal to improve patients' outcomes. In this context, intraoperative tumor-specific imaging might facilitate optimized cytoreduction. In neurosurgery, intraoperative 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) guided imaging is applied in clinical routine to assess surgical resection margins. Here, we report the case of a patient with ovarian cancer in whom intraoperative 5-ALA tumor visualization led to optimized complete cytoreduction. Objective: Intraoperative administration of 5-ALA led to improved complete cytoreduction by identification and resection of additional ovarian cancer tumor manifestations. Case: The 39-year-old patient, Jehovah`s witness, presented to our department with a left sided ovarian mass, suspicious of ovarian cancer, based on clinical examination, sonographic suspicious features and a CA12-5 elevation. The patient's medical history and family history was unremarkable. Preoperative CT imaging of the thorax and abdomen showed no pathology besides the adnexal mass. Surgery was performed by a midline laparotomy with hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, pelvic peritonectomy, omentectomy, ureterolysis, diaphragm stripping, adhesiolysis and the collection of peritoneal and rectal samples. Intraoperative 5-ALA imaging using a dedicated excitation and detection loupe system (Reveal, DVI) led to tumor detection at the diaphragm, the omentum and the rectum that was not detectable by palpation and visualization using white light. The pathology results revealed that the 5-ALA positive samples (diaphragm, rectum and omentum) obtained by intraoperative 5-ALA were positive for ovarian cancer. Conclusion: Intraoperative administration of 5-ALA represents a promising approach to improve complete cytoreduction in ovarian cancer surgery thereby improving clinical outcomes. Hence, further research and clinical trials are required to investigate the potential of intraoperative 5-ALA imaging in ovarian cancer debulking surgery and its impact on long-term clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
Cesarean section (CS) is the most widely performed and one of the most painful surgeries. This study investigated postoperative pain after CS using patient-related outcomes (PROs) to identify risk factors for severe pain. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the influence of surgery indication (primary CS (PCS) vs. urgent CS (UCS)). This multi-center, prospective cohort study included data submitted to the pain registry "quality improvement in postoperative pain treatment" (QUIPS) between 2010 and 2020. In total, 11,932 patients were evaluated. Median of maximal pain was 7.0 (numeric rating scale (NRS) 0 to 10); 53.9% suffered from severe pain (NRS ≥ 7), this being related to impairment of mood, ambulation, deep breathing and sleep, as well as more vertigo, nausea and tiredness (p < 0.001). Distraction, relaxation, mobilization, having conversations, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and pain monitoring were shown to be protective for severe pain (p < 0.001). Maximal pain in PCS and UCS was similar, but UCS obtained more analgesics (p < 0.001), and experienced more impairment of ambulation (p < 0.001) and deep breathing (p < 0.05). Severe pain has a major effect on daily-life activities and recovery after CS, and depends on modifiable factors. More effort is needed to improve the quality of care after CS.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: For healthy women entering birth after uneventful pregnancy, midwife-led models of care have the potential to reduce interventions and increase the vaginal birth rate. In Germany, 98.4% of women are giving birth in consultant-led obstetric units. Alongside midwifery units (AMU) have been established in 2003. We compared the outcome of women registered for planned birth in the AMU at our hospital with a matched group of low-risk women who gave birth in standard obstetric care during the same period of time. METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort study design. The study group consisted of all women admitted to labor ward who had registered for birth in AMU from 2010 to 2017. For the control group, low-risk women were selected; additionally, matching was performed for parity. Mode of birth was chosen as primary outcome parameter for the mother. For the neonate, a composite primary outcome (5-min Apgar < 7 or umbilical cord arterial pH < 7.10 or transfer to specialist neonatal care) was defined. Secondary outcomes included epidural anesthesia, duration of the second stage of labor, episiotomy, obstetric injury, and postpartum hemorrhage. Non-inferiority was assessed, and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Six hundred twelve women were admitted for labor in AMU, the control group consisted of 612 women giving birth in standard obstetric care. Women in the study group were on average older and had a higher body mass index (BMI); birthweight was on average 95 g higher. Non-inferiority could be established for the primary outcome parameters. Epidural anesthesia and episiotomy rates were lower, and the mean duration of the second stage of labor was shorter in the study group; second-degree perineal tears were less common, higher-order obstetric lacerations occurred more frequently. Overall, 50.3% of women were transferred to standard obstetric care. Regression analysis revealed effects of parity, age and birthweight on the chance of transfer. CONCLUSION: Compared to births in our consultant-led obstetric unit, the outcome of births planned in the AMU was not inferior, and intervention rates were lower. Our results support the integration of AMU as a complementary model of care for low-risk women.
